Comments on: IE7 hover bug: z-index ignored (and other properties) http://friendlybit.com/css/ie7-hover-bug-z-index-ignored-and-other-properties/ You have found Friendly Bit, a web development blog. I focus on client side technologies like CSS, HTML and Javascript. You find my articles below and categories to the right. Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:54:48 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Johnathanhttp://friendlybit.com/css/ie7-hover-bug-z-index-ignored-and-other-properties/#comment-31362 Johnathan Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:56:55 +0000 http://friendlybit.com/?p=285#comment-31362 Imagine what we could do if IE was not here anymore? This article brought a smile to my eyes:http://digg.com/software/Mozilla_IExplorer_biggest_problem_in_advancing_the_Web"Mozilla: IExplorer biggest problem in advancing the Web. news.cnet.com — IE still doesn't remotely approach Firefox, but we do hope to see IE standards compliance and its modern features improved. The single biggest problem now in moving the Web forward is having to deal with people using back versions of IE." Imagine what we could do if IE was not here anymore? This article brought a smile to my eyes:

http://digg.com/software/Mozilla_IExplorer_biggest_problem_in_advancing_the_Web

“Mozilla: IExplorer biggest problem in advancing the Web.
news.cnet.com — IE still doesn’t remotely approach Firefox, but we do hope to see IE standards compliance and its modern features improved. The single biggest problem now in moving the Web forward is having to deal with people using back versions of IE.”

]]> By: Emil Stenströmhttp://friendlybit.com/css/ie7-hover-bug-z-index-ignored-and-other-properties/#comment-31129 Emil Stenström Wed, 29 Oct 2008 06:30:58 +0000 http://friendlybit.com/?p=285#comment-31129 @Pin W: Yes. In this case, I've carefully looked at the browser stats for this intranet. We're 90 people, all using something newer than IE6, so I don't see a reason to go through the annoyance that is fixing-for-IE6. Don't you agree? @Pin W: Yes. In this case, I’ve carefully looked at the browser stats for this intranet. We’re 90 people, all using something newer than IE6, so I don’t see a reason to go through the annoyance that is fixing-for-IE6. Don’t you agree?

]]> By: Pin W.http://friendlybit.com/css/ie7-hover-bug-z-index-ignored-and-other-properties/#comment-31128 Pin W. Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:37:28 +0000 http://friendlybit.com/?p=285#comment-31128 Do you really think not supporting IE6 is acceptable these days, even if its just for an intranet (or even if its NOT an intranet)? Do you really think not supporting IE6 is acceptable these days, even if its just for an intranet (or even if its NOT an intranet)?

]]> By: Andershttp://friendlybit.com/css/ie7-hover-bug-z-index-ignored-and-other-properties/#comment-31116 Anders Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:22:14 +0000 http://friendlybit.com/?p=285#comment-31116 You could always give IETester a try. It provides a clever way of running multiple IE versions side by side, and it includes beta version 2 (i think) of IE8. You could always give IETester a try. It provides a clever way of running multiple IE versions side by side, and it includes beta version 2 (i think) of IE8.

]]> By: Emil Stenströmhttp://friendlybit.com/css/ie7-hover-bug-z-index-ignored-and-other-properties/#comment-31103 Emil Stenström Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:59:42 +0000 http://friendlybit.com/?p=285#comment-31103 @Someone: No, I haven't tried IE8. Last time I tried it out it was so broken it couldn't even render the simplest of things. I'm hearing it's gotten better, but I think I'll wait another beta version. @Someone: No, I haven’t tried IE8. Last time I tried it out it was so broken it couldn’t even render the simplest of things. I’m hearing it’s gotten better, but I think I’ll wait another beta version.

]]> By: Someonehttp://friendlybit.com/css/ie7-hover-bug-z-index-ignored-and-other-properties/#comment-31102 Someone Mon, 13 Oct 2008 19:33:26 +0000 http://friendlybit.com/?p=285#comment-31102 Have you tried IE8? If so, does the same bug exist there? If so, have you reported it? Have you tried IE8? If so, does the same bug exist there? If so, have you reported it?

]]>