Comments on: KTH goes web standards http://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/ You have found Friendly Bit, a web development blog. I focus on client side technologies like CSS, HTML and Javascript. You find my articles below and categories to the right. Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:50:44 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Mariushttp://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-7777 Marius Fri, 24 Nov 2006 13:41:43 +0000 http://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-7777 Hi Emil. Really nice site :) I liked the Swedish version best though :)Not only because i am Norwegian LOL but i think the design is better.Jettebra jobb :) God helj :) Hi Emil.
Really nice site :)
I liked the Swedish version best though :)

Not only because i am Norwegian LOL but i think the design is better.

Jettebra jobb :)
God helj :)

]]> By: zcorpanhttp://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-4015 zcorpan Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:12:50 +0000 http://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-4015 Robert, specifying character encoding with a META element is supposed to be interpreted by the server so that the server can send the correct HTTP headers. It is not intended for the UA. However, in reality servers ignore it and browsers honor it if the server didn't specify any character encoding. In any case, there's no need to specify the character encoding with a META element when the server is correctly configured. Robert, specifying character encoding with a META element is supposed to be interpreted by the server so that the server can send the correct HTTP headers. It is not intended for the UA. However, in reality servers ignore it and browsers honor it if the server didn’t specify any character encoding. In any case, there’s no need to specify the character encoding with a META element when the server is correctly configured.

]]> By: Emil Stenströmhttp://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-4009 Emil Stenström Sun, 27 Aug 2006 08:40:29 +0000 http://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-4009 @exe: In fact it does. In this example you can check the HTTP response and you'll see: <code>Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8</code> @exe: In fact it does. In this example you can check the HTTP response and you’ll see: Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8

]]> By: exehttp://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-3977 exe Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:36:47 +0000 http://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-3977 Doesn't the server send a character encoding anyway by default? Doesn’t the server send a character encoding anyway by default?

]]> By: Robert Nymanhttp://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-3939 Robert Nyman Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:21:52 +0000 http://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-3939 Not sure. But why not just specify it to make sure? :-)Otherwise it looks very good and it's commendable that such an institution get such good code on its site. Not sure. But why not just specify it to make sure? :-)

Otherwise it looks very good and it’s commendable that such an institution get such good code on its site.

]]> By: Emil Stenströmhttp://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-3938 Emil Stenström Fri, 25 Aug 2006 06:24:18 +0000 http://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-3938 @Robert Nyman: No you're right. I'm pretty sure that the default character encoding is UTF-8 if nothing else is specified. Is there any known caveates with that?Btw, see how nicely we avoided inline styles ;) @Robert Nyman: No you’re right. I’m pretty sure that the default character encoding is UTF-8 if nothing else is specified. Is there any known caveates with that?

Btw, see how nicely we avoided inline styles ;)

]]> By: Robert Nymanhttp://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-3929 Robert Nyman Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:28:51 +0000 http://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-3929 Nice! Although there doesn't seem to be any character encoding on the site. Nice! Although there doesn’t seem to be any character encoding on the site.

]]> By: Emil Stenströmhttp://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-3907 Emil Stenström Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:51:02 +0000 http://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-3907 @Nate: The international site (link at the top) is not yet updated if you want to compare it with the new site. @Nate: The international site (link at the top) is not yet updated if you want to compare it with the new site.

]]> By: Natehttp://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-3906 Nate Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:58:54 +0000 http://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-3906 I think it looks great! Though I didnt see the previous site, I am sure this is a HUGE step up! Congrats on a job well done! I think it looks great! Though I didnt see the previous site, I am sure this is a HUGE step up! Congrats on a job well done!

]]> By: Thomas Sydorowskihttp://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-3898 Thomas Sydorowski Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:52:13 +0000 http://friendlybit.com/css/kth-goes-web-standards/#comment-3898 Wow, very nice Huvet! Wow, very nice Huvet!

]]>