<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Real hackers don&#8217;t use CSS</title> <atom:link href="http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/</link> <description>You have found Friendly Bit, a web development blog. I focus on client side technologies like CSS, HTML and Javascript. You find my articles below and categories to the right.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:54:48 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Mohammed Shaheer</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-33204</link> <dc:creator>Mohammed Shaheer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:33:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-33204</guid> <description>Inspiring Story :)can you give me some links of 96 sites which are still the same as they were before (in 96)?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inspiring Story :)</p><p>can you give me some links of 96 sites which are still the same as they were before (in 96)?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: BordomBeThyName</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-30580</link> <dc:creator>BordomBeThyName</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 06:19:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-30580</guid> <description>I can&#039;t help but notice that your entire site is divs and css, not a table in sight...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help but notice that your entire site is divs and css, not a table in sight&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stahn</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-30539</link> <dc:creator>Stahn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 10:31:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-30539</guid> <description>Your narration captivated me. Thanks for the reading. You should write a romantic novel =P</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your narration captivated me. Thanks for the reading. You should write a romantic novel =P</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Gustavo Benedito</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-30516</link> <dc:creator>Gustavo Benedito</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:26:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-30516</guid> <description>Lots of discussion, but no one really got to the point: where&#039;s the source of the 25-frame layout?;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots of discussion, but no one really got to the point: where&#8217;s the source of the 25-frame layout?</p><p>;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Emil Stenström</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-30478</link> <dc:creator>Emil Stenström</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 11:32:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-30478</guid> <description>@Arshad: CSS for layout is an alternative to tables, you don&#039;t need to use tables anymore...That exact layout could be done without old technologies...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Arshad: CSS for layout is an alternative to tables, you don&#8217;t need to use tables anymore&#8230;That exact layout could be done without old technologies&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Arshad</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-30477</link> <dc:creator>Arshad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 04:46:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-30477</guid> <description>A good site is built using mix of all the technologies and content required for balanced look. With today&#039;s high speed internet, an all-text site isn&#039;t really of the same value as it was a decade ago. Just today while searching for some web development needs, I came across a site having blend of flash, images, css, tables and simple html - it was superb. In case someone needs to verify my comments u can see for yrself at http://www.cursivebits.com</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good site is built using mix of all the technologies and content required for balanced look. With today&#8217;s high speed internet, an all-text site isn&#8217;t really of the same value as it was a decade ago. Just today while searching for some web development needs, I came across a site having blend of flash, images, css, tables and simple html &#8211; it was superb. In case someone needs to verify my comments u can see for yrself at <a
href="http://www.cursivebits.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cursivebits.com</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alexander</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-30399</link> <dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 05:20:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-30399</guid> <description>Never in my career as a web developer have I been called a hacker or called a fellow web dever a hacker....we aren&#039;t hackers...Hackers hack things. They gain access. We are developers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never in my career as a web developer have I been called a hacker or called a fellow web dever a hacker&#8230;.we aren&#8217;t hackers&#8230;</p><p>Hackers hack things. They gain access. We are developers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Roland</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-30267</link> <dc:creator>Roland</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:51:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-30267</guid> <description>Hey, i was one these guys which used frames and tables, too. :-)
I can remember very well, how it was when I started using CSS and XHTML for tableless, semantic Webdesign. Some colleagues were annoyed, cause they didn&#039;t want to change their ways of working.
Nice article!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, i was one these guys which used frames and tables, too. :-)<br
/> I can remember very well, how it was when I started using CSS and XHTML for tableless, semantic Webdesign. Some colleagues were annoyed, cause they didn&#8217;t want to change their ways of working.<br
/> Nice article!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alan Hood</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-27880</link> <dc:creator>Alan Hood</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:09:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-27880</guid> <description>Oh you nitpicking semantics people.  Don&#039;t you know that all this messing around with new fangled ideas can be solved with a little line that says &quot;Optimised for / Best viewed in&quot; with a list of what specific browser, screen resolution, operating system and a big list of all the client-side stuff the user should spend hours obtaining and installing, then come back to view your site how you wanted them to see it.And if you&#039;re worried about people getting bored while they are doing all that, stick a big flash animated loading screen for them to look at.  Don&#039;t forget to give a link for those who haven&#039;t got flash player installed yet though!!Seriously, happened upon this page at work whilst I was browsing sites to improve my CSS skills and it brightened up my afternoon.  So much rings true.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh you nitpicking semantics people.  Don&#8217;t you know that all this messing around with new fangled ideas can be solved with a little line that says &#8220;Optimised for / Best viewed in&#8221; with a list of what specific browser, screen resolution, operating system and a big list of all the client-side stuff the user should spend hours obtaining and installing, then come back to view your site how you wanted them to see it.</p><p>And if you&#8217;re worried about people getting bored while they are doing all that, stick a big flash animated loading screen for them to look at.  Don&#8217;t forget to give a link for those who haven&#8217;t got flash player installed yet though!!</p><p>Seriously, happened upon this page at work whilst I was browsing sites to improve my CSS skills and it brightened up my afternoon.  So much rings true.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mindgraffiti &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Essential Reading for Future Web Designers &#38; Developers</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-27348</link> <dc:creator>mindgraffiti &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Essential Reading for Future Web Designers &#38; Developers</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:47:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-27348</guid> <description>[...] Real Hackers don&#8217;t use CSS a walk through the design process, from tables and frames to CSS. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Real Hackers don&#8217;t use CSS a walk through the design process, from tables and frames to CSS. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Siegfried</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-26615</link> <dc:creator>Siegfried</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 06:47:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-26615</guid> <description>I think we both get the point, but out in the wild the term &quot;Designer&quot; is closely related to graphical design. So the term &quot;Web Designer&quot; today just simply is a &quot;Screen painter&quot;. This assiciation is not good for the whole profession.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we both get the point, but out in the wild the term &#8220;Designer&#8221; is closely related to graphical design. So the term &#8220;Web Designer&#8221; today just simply is a &#8220;Screen painter&#8221;. This assiciation is not good for the whole profession.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Emil Stenström</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-26610</link> <dc:creator>Emil Stenström</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:52:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-26610</guid> <description>@Siegfried: Well articulated. In the article I mean design as in graphical design, but I&#039;m sure you get the point as much as I do. Thanks for commenting!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Siegfried: Well articulated. In the article I mean design as in graphical design, but I&#8217;m sure you get the point as much as I do. Thanks for commenting!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Siegfried</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-26597</link> <dc:creator>Siegfried</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 08:06:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-26597</guid> <description>There&#039;s one very wrong point in how those &quot;Designers&quot; think. As you already wrote, they took their pretty print design and wanted to make the web page look like that. So in fact they where print designers, not web designers. But web pages are not limited to one media. Sure, you could print a web page and then get the exact look of the former printed flyer. But obviously navigational elements are pointless on printed paper. So simply from that point it should be obviously a difference between a web page and a printed paper. This difference is the main point in all those misunderstanding between the &quot;hackers&quot; and the &quot;designers&quot;. Although i think both names are used wrong here. Hackers are designers, too. They do design functionality. This is a very important part of design as well. Design is not only about painting pretty images.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s one very wrong point in how those &#8220;Designers&#8221; think. As you already wrote, they took their pretty print design and wanted to make the web page look like that. So in fact they where print designers, not web designers. But web pages are not limited to one media. Sure, you could print a web page and then get the exact look of the former printed flyer. But obviously navigational elements are pointless on printed paper. So simply from that point it should be obviously a difference between a web page and a printed paper. This difference is the main point in all those misunderstanding between the &#8220;hackers&#8221; and the &#8220;designers&#8221;. Although i think both names are used wrong here. Hackers are designers, too. They do design functionality. This is a very important part of design as well. Design is not only about painting pretty images.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: OPC Toolbox &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some Funny and Informative CSS Articles</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-24709</link> <dc:creator>OPC Toolbox &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some Funny and Informative CSS Articles</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 05:42:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-24709</guid> <description>[...] A couple of slightly tongue in cheek articles about the different levels of CSS knowledge in and around the Web Design/Development community, by Emil Stenström. Levels of CSS knowledge and Real hackers don’t use CSS. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A couple of slightly tongue in cheek articles about the different levels of CSS knowledge in and around the Web Design/Development community, by Emil Stenström. Levels of CSS knowledge and Real hackers don’t use CSS. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: viva la standardistas</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-23353</link> <dc:creator>viva la standardistas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 23:35:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/real-hackers-dont-use-css/#comment-23353</guid> <description>Two words:&lt;strong&gt;VIEW SOURCE&lt;/strong&gt;CSS cleans the presentational cruft out of the markup. This makes pages so much easier to maintain.
&lt;em&gt;Especially when dealing with server-side code&lt;/em&gt; like php, asp, cfml, etc.Can you imagine trying to maintain application code with all of that font, bgcolor, spacer gif garbage mixed in with it?  I&#039;ve lived it, and it was horrifying.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two words:</p><p><strong>VIEW SOURCE</strong></p><p>CSS cleans the presentational cruft out of the markup. This makes pages so much easier to maintain.</p><p><em>Especially when dealing with server-side code</em> like php, asp, cfml, etc.</p><p>Can you imagine trying to maintain application code with all of that font, bgcolor, spacer gif garbage mixed in with it?  I&#8217;ve lived it, and it was horrifying.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/36 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk

Served from: c8.67.364a.static.theplanet.com @ 2010-03-12 13:14:45 -->