<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transparent PNGs and IE6 standalone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/</link>
	<description>Strategic web development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-24357</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 21:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-24357</guid>
		<description>I saw that at the bottom of the Multiple IE Page that he added AlphaImageLoader a little ways back...

&quot;Updated on 07/11/2006: (IE6) fixed cookies/sessions support+ AlphaImageLoader support&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that at the bottom of the Multiple IE Page that he added AlphaImageLoader a little ways back&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Updated on 07/11/2006: (IE6) fixed cookies/sessions support+ AlphaImageLoader support&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil Stenström</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-24130</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil Stenström</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 12:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-24130</guid>
		<description>@Stu: Hi Stu, nice to see some celebrities here on my little blog :)

The IE6 Standalone version I&#039;m using (linked to in the first paragraph) has the conditional comments problem solved. I&#039;ve confirmed that it works. 

The only two things that annoy me about IE6 standalone right now is the problem above and that you don&#039;t get any print previews from it. Other than that it&#039;s a great tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stu: Hi Stu, nice to see some celebrities here on my little blog :)</p>
<p>The IE6 Standalone version I&#8217;m using (linked to in the first paragraph) has the conditional comments problem solved. I&#8217;ve confirmed that it works. </p>
<p>The only two things that annoy me about IE6 standalone right now is the problem above and that you don&#8217;t get any print previews from it. Other than that it&#8217;s a great tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-24123</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 11:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-24123</guid>
		<description>I believe that IE6 standalone, on the same PC as IE7, thinks that it is IE7 as far as conditional comments are concerned. So conditional comments targetting IE6 are ignored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that IE6 standalone, on the same PC as IE7, thinks that it is IE7 as far as conditional comments are concerned. So conditional comments targetting IE6 are ignored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dutch</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-24013</link>
		<dc:creator>Dutch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 22:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-24013</guid>
		<description>How familiar this problem. I use PNG in my website and really like the effects. But testing in IE6 gave the problems you describe in this subject. Since fixes are not always valid, I made a separate CSS file for IE 5.5 till IE 6.0 without the PNG effects.

I hope IE 6 (in March 2007 still 38,7% of all used browsers) will update IE 7 (in March 2007 18% of all browsers) very soon or use another kind browser like Firefox (in March 2007 31,8% of all used browsers).

Source statistics:
w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How familiar this problem. I use PNG in my website and really like the effects. But testing in IE6 gave the problems you describe in this subject. Since fixes are not always valid, I made a separate CSS file for IE 5.5 till IE 6.0 without the PNG effects.</p>
<p>I hope IE 6 (in March 2007 still 38,7% of all used browsers) will update IE 7 (in March 2007 18% of all browsers) very soon or use another kind browser like Firefox (in March 2007 31,8% of all used browsers).</p>
<p>Source statistics:<br />
w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil Stenström</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23951</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil Stenström</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 07:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23951</guid>
		<description>@Jonas Hallgren: What about doing a writeup on the differences between them yourself? I can publish it here if you want?

@Adam Rissner: Yeah, another computer is always an option, it&#039;s just that you can&#039;t have one computer per browser...

@Smarmy: I&#039;d love too. Don&#039;t be supriced if I do...

@George Morris: A little too promotional, removed url, sorry. What technique did you use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonas Hallgren: What about doing a writeup on the differences between them yourself? I can publish it here if you want?</p>
<p>@Adam Rissner: Yeah, another computer is always an option, it&#8217;s just that you can&#8217;t have one computer per browser&#8230;</p>
<p>@Smarmy: I&#8217;d love too. Don&#8217;t be supriced if I do&#8230;</p>
<p>@George Morris: A little too promotional, removed url, sorry. What technique did you use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Morris</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23946</link>
		<dc:creator>George Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 02:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23946</guid>
		<description>We had a hell of a time trying to get transparency to work on our last major project, Oolong Tees. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a hell of a time trying to get transparency to work on our last major project, Oolong Tees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smarmy</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23854</link>
		<dc:creator>Smarmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23854</guid>
		<description>Emil, I love that you love Fireworks. You should do a write up on FW&#039;s advantages over the other image editors in the market today. No one seems to believe me when I praise its powerful capabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emil, I love that you love Fireworks. You should do a write up on FW&#8217;s advantages over the other image editors in the market today. No one seems to believe me when I praise its powerful capabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Risser</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23851</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Risser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23851</guid>
		<description>Hi Emil,

I was just struggling with  transparent PNGs and IE6 stand alone last night. A wasted hour later, I came to the same conclusion as you!  I tried the iepngfix.htc and I believe that also did not work in the IE6 standalone, though I may be wrong.  In the end, I ended up dragging out an old laptop to use IE6 to solve the problem.  Good article!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Emil,</p>
<p>I was just struggling with  transparent PNGs and IE6 stand alone last night. A wasted hour later, I came to the same conclusion as you!  I tried the iepngfix.htc and I believe that also did not work in the IE6 standalone, though I may be wrong.  In the end, I ended up dragging out an old laptop to use IE6 to solve the problem.  Good article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas Hallgren</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23824</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Hallgren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23824</guid>
		<description>Ah, ok, tastes vary, the PNG testing was the only reason I got VPC in the first place and it&#039;s only 2 mousklicks if you have a saved state :) I am currently looking into the differences between bgsleight.js, lepngfix.htc and Michael Lovitt&#039;s opacity script found at http://alistapart.com/stories/pngopacity/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, ok, tastes vary, the PNG testing was the only reason I got VPC in the first place and it&#8217;s only 2 mousklicks if you have a saved state :) I am currently looking into the differences between bgsleight.js, lepngfix.htc and Michael Lovitt&#8217;s opacity script found at <a href="http://alistapart.com/stories/pngopacity/" rel="nofollow">http://alistapart.com/stories/pngopacity/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil Stenström</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23819</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil Stenström</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 09:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23819</guid>
		<description>@Jonas Hallgren: I wouldn&#039;t say this minor difference is a reason to go through the hazzle of starting up a virtual machine. I&#039;d rather run it like I run Opera and Firefox on the side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonas Hallgren: I wouldn&#8217;t say this minor difference is a reason to go through the hazzle of starting up a virtual machine. I&#8217;d rather run it like I run Opera and Firefox on the side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas Hallgren</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23818</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Hallgren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 08:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23818</guid>
		<description>I decided to use the Virtual PC Console instead of a standalone IE6, there is even a new updated version of VPC out now. And the latest Win XP SP2 iso is legit until aug 07. Works like a charm. Try it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I decided to use the Virtual PC Console instead of a standalone IE6, there is even a new updated version of VPC out now. And the latest Win XP SP2 iso is legit until aug 07. Works like a charm. Try it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil Stenström</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23807</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil Stenström</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 01:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23807</guid>
		<description>@Terrence Wood: You are restating the article&#039;s conclusion, why?

I&#039;ll have a look at bgsleight, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Terrence Wood: You are restating the article&#8217;s conclusion, why?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have a look at bgsleight, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrence Wood</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23801</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrence Wood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/css/transparent-pngs-and-ie6-standalone/#comment-23801</guid>
		<description>IE has always supported transparency on png-8 and it makes no difference if is installed as a standalone version or not.

I use a variation of bgsleight to manage png-24 , it seems to work with IE standalone, and has the advantage of supporting background-repeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IE has always supported transparency on png-8 and it makes no difference if is installed as a standalone version or not.</p>
<p>I use a variation of bgsleight to manage png-24 , it seems to work with IE standalone, and has the advantage of supporting background-repeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 376/382 objects using disk: basic

Served from: friendlybit.com @ 2012-02-04 05:19:12 -->
