<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Yellow fade with CSS and a simple image</title> <atom:link href="http://friendlybit.com/css/yellow-fade-with-css-and-a-simple-image/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/yellow-fade-with-css-and-a-simple-image/</link> <description>You have found Friendly Bit, a web development blog. I focus on client side technologies like CSS, HTML and Javascript. You find my articles below and categories to the right.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:50:44 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Emil Stenström</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/yellow-fade-with-css-and-a-simple-image/#comment-33091</link> <dc:creator>Emil Stenström</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:52:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/?p=276#comment-33091</guid> <description>@Jeff Seager: Thanks for your support :) There are pros and cons to both techniques. The descibed method is best when you believe that a yellow highlight is design, then it should be in the CSS. If you think it&#039;s behaviour, then in the JS file.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeff Seager: Thanks for your support :) There are pros and cons to both techniques. The descibed method is best when you believe that a yellow highlight is design, then it should be in the CSS. If you think it&#8217;s behaviour, then in the JS file.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff Seager</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/yellow-fade-with-css-and-a-simple-image/#comment-33083</link> <dc:creator>Jeff Seager</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:13:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/?p=276#comment-33083</guid> <description>Well, guys, it&#039;s useful in terms of progressive enhancement, where you should always do every enhancement at the lowest level, where it places the least burden on the end user&#039;s resources.Using Emil&#039;s CSS method, the desired effect is achieved even without javascript -- to be enjoyed equally by those who don&#039;t have it enabled for some reason.I like it. So ... Thank you, Emil!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, guys, it&#8217;s useful in terms of progressive enhancement, where you should always do every enhancement at the lowest level, where it places the least burden on the end user&#8217;s resources.</p><p>Using Emil&#8217;s CSS method, the desired effect is achieved even without javascript &#8212; to be enjoyed equally by those who don&#8217;t have it enabled for some reason.</p><p>I like it. So &#8230; Thank you, Emil!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: hullrotterdamferry</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/yellow-fade-with-css-and-a-simple-image/#comment-31796</link> <dc:creator>hullrotterdamferry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:01:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/?p=276#comment-31796</guid> <description>Hi,Nice stuff, simply explained but I have to agree with Odin above there ... couple of lines of jquery and you&#039;re done.Cheers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p><p>Nice stuff, simply explained but I have to agree with Odin above there &#8230; couple of lines of jquery and you&#8217;re done.</p><p>Cheers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: THE&#124;ODIN.co.uk &#124; Web Blog</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/yellow-fade-with-css-and-a-simple-image/#comment-31101</link> <dc:creator>THE&#124;ODIN.co.uk &#124; Web Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:38:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/?p=276#comment-31101</guid> <description>[...] little while ago I read a tutorial on FriendlyBit about how to create a fading background in CSS. I quoted on that blog that this same effect would [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] little while ago I read a tutorial on FriendlyBit about how to create a fading background in CSS. I quoted on that blog that this same effect would [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Emil Stenström</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/yellow-fade-with-css-and-a-simple-image/#comment-31091</link> <dc:creator>Emil Stenström</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 19:34:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/?p=276#comment-31091</guid> <description>@Robert Nyman: Well, the IE users are getting fewer and fewer, and IE8 is approaching. Soon helping people will be easy :)@THE&#124;ODIN: What do you mean &quot;make text longer&quot;?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robert Nyman: Well, the IE users are getting fewer and fewer, and IE8 is approaching. Soon helping people will be easy :)</p><p>@THE|ODIN: What do you mean &#8220;make text longer&#8221;?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: THE&#124;ODIN</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/yellow-fade-with-css-and-a-simple-image/#comment-31090</link> <dc:creator>THE&#124;ODIN</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:20:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/?p=276#comment-31090</guid> <description>Hey, im not sure how useful that actually is. I mean yeah it works(the first time) but what happens when you wanna make your text longer? You could do this really painlessly with about 2 lines of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jquery.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;jquery&lt;/a&gt;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, im not sure how useful that actually is. I mean yeah it works(the first time) but what happens when you wanna make your text longer? You could do this really painlessly with about 2 lines of <a
href="http://www.jquery.com" rel="nofollow">jquery</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Robert Nyman</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/yellow-fade-with-css-and-a-simple-image/#comment-31089</link> <dc:creator>Robert Nyman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 18:53:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/?p=276#comment-31089</guid> <description>Always good with alternatives. However, I&#039;d argue that IE users are the users who would have the most use of/need for visual (and any other sort of) guidance... :-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always good with alternatives. However, I&#8217;d argue that IE users are the users who would have the most use of/need for visual (and any other sort of) guidance&#8230; :-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan Pettersson</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/yellow-fade-with-css-and-a-simple-image/#comment-31088</link> <dc:creator>Dan Pettersson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:43:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/?p=276#comment-31088</guid> <description>@Peter: It doesn&#039;t work if you click the same thing twice, but if you click something else between it&#039;ll work. &lt;a href=&quot;#respond&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Try&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;#example&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;these&lt;/a&gt;.I agree - it&#039;s nice, although a fade without a GIF would be nice...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peter: It doesn&#8217;t work if you click the same thing twice, but if you click something else between it&#8217;ll work. <a
href="#respond">Try</a> <a
href="#example">these</a>.</p><p>I agree &#8211; it&#8217;s nice, although a fade without a GIF would be nice&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter</title><link>http://friendlybit.com/css/yellow-fade-with-css-and-a-simple-image/#comment-31087</link> <dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 18:37:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/?p=276#comment-31087</guid> <description>Nice one. But the downside is that it only works for one click.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one. But the downside is that it only works for one click.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 14/24 queries in 0.017 seconds using disk

Served from: c8.67.364a.static.theplanet.com @ 2010-03-13 17:50:26 -->