<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Web 2.0? Really.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/</link>
	<description>You have found Friendly Bit, a web development blog. I focus on client side technologies like CSS, HTML and Javascript. You find my articles below and categories to the right.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Web2.0 : Burad&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-30663</link>
		<dc:creator>Web2.0 : Burad&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-30663</guid>
		<description>[...] good explanatory article What is Web 2.0? Really.    March 30, 2006 &#124; Filed Under web2.0&#160;  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] good explanatory article What is Web 2.0? Really.    March 30, 2006 | Filed Under web2.0&nbsp;  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil Stenström</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-30551</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil Stenström</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-30551</guid>
		<description>@Sasha: I guess you didn't read the article? It has a rather specific definition, that I hear lots of people agree with... Sure, there will be people that only focus on the technology part, AJAX, RSS, and so on, but we all know that there's more to it than that... Lets educate people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sasha: I guess you didn&#8217;t read the article? It has a rather specific definition, that I hear lots of people agree with&#8230; Sure, there will be people that only focus on the technology part, AJAX, RSS, and so on, but we all know that there&#8217;s more to it than that&#8230; Lets educate people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sasha</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-30548</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-30548</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think Web 2.0 is a bunch of bullshit. These days, calling a website Web 2.0 is the same as calling it good. I am writing a post about this on my upcoming blog.

Web 2.0 is just a buzzword that helps companies attract developers. It doesn't mean anything. It's an effective buzzword, yes, but a buzzword nonetheless.

It doesn't matter what it actually means, it's misused. Nowadays, when people think of a Web 2.0 web application, they think of a modern, flashy, interactive web app with rounded corners and Ajax. That's not what Web 2.0 is at all. (Or at least not what it was originally meant to be.) I say the only time you should use the phrase is in marketing, because I do have to admit it is an effective eye-catcher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think Web 2.0 is a bunch of bullshit. These days, calling a website Web 2.0 is the same as calling it good. I am writing a post about this on my upcoming blog.</p>
<p>Web 2.0 is just a buzzword that helps companies attract developers. It doesn&#8217;t mean anything. It&#8217;s an effective buzzword, yes, but a buzzword nonetheless.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter what it actually means, it&#8217;s misused. Nowadays, when people think of a Web 2.0 web application, they think of a modern, flashy, interactive web app with rounded corners and Ajax. That&#8217;s not what Web 2.0 is at all. (Or at least not what it was originally meant to be.) I say the only time you should use the phrase is in marketing, because I do have to admit it is an effective eye-catcher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seb</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-28390</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 18:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-28390</guid>
		<description>When the internet becomes really useful, web 2 has arrived.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the internet becomes really useful, web 2 has arrived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: agum &#187; "Web 2.0" and "Next-gen Web App"</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-24679</link>
		<dc:creator>agum &#187; "Web 2.0" and "Next-gen Web App"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 10:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-24679</guid>
		<description>[...] at friendlybit.com wrote a really good article about the definition of Web 2.0. It basically means that it takes a combination of these things to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at friendlybit.com wrote a really good article about the definition of Web 2.0. It basically means that it takes a combination of these things to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigi</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-24565</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 10:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-24565</guid>
		<description>Very good article. It's something I can refer people to when explaining to people the definition of Web 2.0.

Btw, came across this site randomly the other day -- love all your articles about web dev. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good article. It&#8217;s something I can refer people to when explaining to people the definition of Web 2.0.</p>
<p>Btw, came across this site randomly the other day &#8212; love all your articles about web dev. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: " &#187; Links for the Weekend, 4-21-2007" by Web Site Marketing Information</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-23599</link>
		<dc:creator>" &#187; Links for the Weekend, 4-21-2007" by Web Site Marketing Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 16:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-23599</guid>
		<description>[...] What is Web 2.0? Really - nice article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What is Web 2.0? Really - nice article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links for the Weekend, 4-21-2007</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-23595</link>
		<dc:creator>Links for the Weekend, 4-21-2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 14:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-23595</guid>
		<description>[...] What is Web 2.0? Really - nice article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] What is Web 2.0? Really - nice article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devmag</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-22587</link>
		<dc:creator>devmag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-22587</guid>
		<description>Hey!
Thanks for the interesting article. The part about "Syndication of Content and Services" I considered to be very important. The "Web 2.0" Generation (or whatever you might call them) discovers the potential of the internet not solely for information distribution purposes but for integrating and creating whole new services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!<br />
Thanks for the interesting article. The part about &#8220;Syndication of Content and Services&#8221; I considered to be very important. The &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; Generation (or whatever you might call them) discovers the potential of the internet not solely for information distribution purposes but for integrating and creating whole new services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lewis litanzios</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-22440</link>
		<dc:creator>lewis litanzios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-22440</guid>
		<description>insightful article. thanks for the time.

if only someone would come up with a web tool that prohibits web publishers (self professed 'web designers?!') from exhibiting the w3c validation icon for the fun of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>insightful article. thanks for the time.</p>
<p>if only someone would come up with a web tool that prohibits web publishers (self professed &#8216;web designers?!&#8217;) from exhibiting the w3c validation icon for the fun of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil Stenström</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-22274</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil Stenström</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-22274</guid>
		<description>@Chris Huff: While Tim isn't wrong I think he misses a few of the vital parts with his definition. That's why I "diss" it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris Huff: While Tim isn&#8217;t wrong I think he misses a few of the vital parts with his definition. That&#8217;s why I &#8220;diss&#8221; it :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Huff</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-22273</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Huff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 13:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-22273</guid>
		<description>Good analysis of Web 2.0!  I probably wouldn't have dissed O'Reilly's definition (isn't he close to deity?) but to each his own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good analysis of Web 2.0!  I probably wouldn&#8217;t have dissed O&#8217;Reilly&#8217;s definition (isn&#8217;t he close to deity?) but to each his own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil Stenström</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-22270</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil Stenström</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-22270</guid>
		<description>@Antti Kupila: It sure did work out in the end for many Web 2.0 companies. But my question is whether business plans should be included in Web 2.0 at all. Selling to a bigger company is not very Web 2.0:ish to me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Antti Kupila: It sure did work out in the end for many Web 2.0 companies. But my question is whether business plans should be included in Web 2.0 at all. Selling to a bigger company is not very Web 2.0:ish to me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antti Kupila</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-22269</link>
		<dc:creator>Antti Kupila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 11:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-22269</guid>
		<description>Nice article. I however think that to get sold to a bigger company (Yahoo, Google etc) may be the business plan in the long run. This is also known as an exit plan in the business world.

Just look at YouTube, I'm sure the purpose for the owner (Google) is different now after the acquisition than before. I can't say all this was planned when YouTube started, and many "web 2.0" probably don't have a business plan even in as an exit plan, but it still worked out pretty good for the founders :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. I however think that to get sold to a bigger company (Yahoo, Google etc) may be the business plan in the long run. This is also known as an exit plan in the business world.</p>
<p>Just look at YouTube, I&#8217;m sure the purpose for the owner (Google) is different now after the acquisition than before. I can&#8217;t say all this was planned when YouTube started, and many &#8220;web 2.0&#8243; probably don&#8217;t have a business plan even in as an exit plan, but it still worked out pretty good for the founders :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil Stenström</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-22265</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil Stenström</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 09:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/js/what-is-web-20-really/#comment-22265</guid>
		<description>@Magnus: Yeah the pressure was getting to high. Also, it's in the Web 2.0 spirit :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Magnus: Yeah the pressure was getting to high. Also, it&#8217;s in the Web 2.0 spirit :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
