<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Click here to read this article</title>
	<atom:link href="http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/</link>
	<description>Strategic web development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 22:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil Stenström</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-32904</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil Stenström</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-32904</guid>
		<description>@Niklas Olsson: Very interesting to hear that &quot;Click here&quot; performs so well in tests. Do I understand you correctly when you say that &quot;read the full entry&quot; performs worse than &quot;To read the full entry - click here&quot;? If that&#039;s the case, it&#039;s seems that the combination of both a descriptive text, and the words &quot;click here&quot; performs best? It might be just my web experience, but to me, the color and underlining of links is what screams &quot;click here&quot;.

About trust and measuring: Maybe you could setup two pages, one with a click here-link to the second page, and another with some text. Then measure the time spent on the second page. If what you said about is correct, I would suspect that more people click through when you include &quot;click here&quot;, but they stay on the second page for a shorter period of time. Even though they clicked, they are not as sure why, and are more likely to click the back button when there. That&#039;s my guess anyway, and my arguments for still staying away from &quot;click here&quot; text.

The Aftonbladet (or any other big site) argument is a misleading one. It didn&#039;t get big because of tricking people to click links they don&#039;t want, do they? They got big because of other reasons, and are tricking people to get more ad impressions. A very different issue altogether!

Thanks for your comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Niklas Olsson: Very interesting to hear that &#8220;Click here&#8221; performs so well in tests. Do I understand you correctly when you say that &#8220;read the full entry&#8221; performs worse than &#8220;To read the full entry &#8211; click here&#8221;? If that&#8217;s the case, it&#8217;s seems that the combination of both a descriptive text, and the words &#8220;click here&#8221; performs best? It might be just my web experience, but to me, the color and underlining of links is what screams &#8220;click here&#8221;.</p>
<p>About trust and measuring: Maybe you could setup two pages, one with a click here-link to the second page, and another with some text. Then measure the time spent on the second page. If what you said about is correct, I would suspect that more people click through when you include &#8220;click here&#8221;, but they stay on the second page for a shorter period of time. Even though they clicked, they are not as sure why, and are more likely to click the back button when there. That&#8217;s my guess anyway, and my arguments for still staying away from &#8220;click here&#8221; text.</p>
<p>The Aftonbladet (or any other big site) argument is a misleading one. It didn&#8217;t get big because of tricking people to click links they don&#8217;t want, do they? They got big because of other reasons, and are tricking people to get more ad impressions. A very different issue altogether!</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niklas Olsson</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-32903</link>
		<dc:creator>Niklas Olsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-32903</guid>
		<description>Interesting discussion here.

I have myself done quite a lot of A/B-testing with call to actions in link text (both images and in written language).

From my experience, &quot;Click here&quot; is an extremely strong call to action that really drives clicks like nothing else.

Of course you need to use it in combination with some other text like &quot;to read the full entry - click here!&quot; to imply what is hidden behind the jump though.

The discussion of trust and how fooling your visitors into visiting pages that they really wasn&#039;t that interested in is very relevant. &quot;Trust&quot; is however a very abstract word and very, very hard to measure why the real consequences of it can only be guessed at.

My favorite example is Sweden&#039;s largest online newspaper Aftonbladet.se that constantly fools its readers with bogus headlines that don&#039;t match the article&#039;s content. Still, it is Sweden&#039;s largest online newspaper. Something worth thinking about :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion here.</p>
<p>I have myself done quite a lot of A/B-testing with call to actions in link text (both images and in written language).</p>
<p>From my experience, &#8220;Click here&#8221; is an extremely strong call to action that really drives clicks like nothing else.</p>
<p>Of course you need to use it in combination with some other text like &#8220;to read the full entry &#8211; click here!&#8221; to imply what is hidden behind the jump though.</p>
<p>The discussion of trust and how fooling your visitors into visiting pages that they really wasn&#8217;t that interested in is very relevant. &#8220;Trust&#8221; is however a very abstract word and very, very hard to measure why the real consequences of it can only be guessed at.</p>
<p>My favorite example is Sweden&#8217;s largest online newspaper Aftonbladet.se that constantly fools its readers with bogus headlines that don&#8217;t match the article&#8217;s content. Still, it is Sweden&#8217;s largest online newspaper. Something worth thinking about :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emil Stenström</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-31663</link>
		<dc:creator>Emil Stenström</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-31663</guid>
		<description>@Haruspex: Well put. There&#039;s no value in people just clicking, you want them to buy stuff, place orders, or read up on some important topic. &quot;Click here&quot; surely is weak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Haruspex: Well put. There&#8217;s no value in people just clicking, you want them to buy stuff, place orders, or read up on some important topic. &#8220;Click here&#8221; surely is weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haruspex</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-31662</link>
		<dc:creator>Haruspex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 00:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-31662</guid>
		<description>@Lazy:  The people using &quot;click here&quot; may or may not know how to market better than Emil, but they do not know how best to market.  A call to action is important, but &quot;click here&quot; is a very weak call to action.

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;http://www.lyrishq.com/content/view/88/&quot;&gt;As a command, “click here” is beautiful in its simplicity, but it falls far short as a call to action – the trigger to launch the customer on the complicated path to conversion – because it doesn’t tell your email readers what you really want them to do.

Nor does it answer that universal question all readers have that drives so many actions: “What’s in it for me?”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You can read more about this in the article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lyrishq.com/content/view/88/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;8 Tips for a Stronger Call to Action&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lazy:  The people using &#8220;click here&#8221; may or may not know how to market better than Emil, but they do not know how best to market.  A call to action is important, but &#8220;click here&#8221; is a very weak call to action.</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.lyrishq.com/content/view/88/"><p>As a command, “click here” is beautiful in its simplicity, but it falls far short as a call to action – the trigger to launch the customer on the complicated path to conversion – because it doesn’t tell your email readers what you really want them to do.</p>
<p>Nor does it answer that universal question all readers have that drives so many actions: “What’s in it for me?”</p></blockquote>
<p>You can read more about this in the article <a href="http://www.lyrishq.com/content/view/88/" rel="nofollow">8 Tips for a Stronger Call to Action</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: News &#187; &#8220;Rules&#8221; for the web</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-31255</link>
		<dc:creator>News &#187; &#8220;Rules&#8221; for the web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-31255</guid>
		<description>[...] clipped from friendlybit.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] clipped from friendlybit.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Rules&#8221; for the web &#171; Technoagita</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-31254</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Rules&#8221; for the web &#171; Technoagita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-31254</guid>
		<description>[...] clipped from friendlybit.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] clipped from friendlybit.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7 Reasons Not to Link with “Click Here” &#124; Business Blog</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-30671</link>
		<dc:creator>7 Reasons Not to Link with “Click Here” &#124; Business Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 11:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-30671</guid>
		<description>[...] billion (yes billion) instances in Google&#8217;s database where website owners have used &#8220;click here&#8221; as linked text on their website. Let me guess, that includes you, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] billion (yes billion) instances in Google&#8217;s database where website owners have used &#8220;click here&#8221; as linked text on their website. Let me guess, that includes you, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7 Reasons Not to Link with &#8220;Click Here&#8221; &#124; Sparkplug CEO</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-30665</link>
		<dc:creator>7 Reasons Not to Link with &#8220;Click Here&#8221; &#124; Sparkplug CEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 18:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-30665</guid>
		<description>[...] billion (yes billion) instances in Google&#8217;s database where website owners have used &#8220;click here&#8221; as linked text on their website. Let me guess, that includes you, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] billion (yes billion) instances in Google&#8217;s database where website owners have used &#8220;click here&#8221; as linked text on their website. Let me guess, that includes you, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-12496</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 09:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-12496</guid>
		<description>You are right... Never thought of that. However, underlined links does look ugly in a text!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right&#8230; Never thought of that. However, underlined links does look ugly in a text!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grafiskblog.dk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hvorfor er beskrivende link tekster vigtige?</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-8655</link>
		<dc:creator>grafiskblog.dk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hvorfor er beskrivende link tekster vigtige?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-8655</guid>
		<description>[...] Linket: Click here to read this article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Linket: Click here to read this article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-8472</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 09:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-8472</guid>
		<description>Totally agree.  In fact &quot;click here&quot; used as link text will fail accessibility validators like cynthia says.  Some developers are getting to understand this so have improved an use better link text like &quot;read more on &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;subject&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&quot;  or &quot;find out about &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;subject&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; here&quot;  but still a correct link text is neeeded for accessibility and better still extra information about the link in the title attribute.

Still I think the &quot;click here&quot; link is going to be around for a while still</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree.  In fact &#8220;click here&#8221; used as link text will fail accessibility validators like cynthia says.  Some developers are getting to understand this so have improved an use better link text like &#8220;read more on <strong><em>subject</em></strong>&#8221;  or &#8220;find out about <strong><em>subject</em></strong> here&#8221;  but still a correct link text is neeeded for accessibility and better still extra information about the link in the title attribute.</p>
<p>Still I think the &#8220;click here&#8221; link is going to be around for a while still</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OPC IT eBusiness Toolbox &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Click here to read this article</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-8469</link>
		<dc:creator>OPC IT eBusiness Toolbox &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Click here to read this article</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 07:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-8469</guid>
		<description>[...] Emil Stenström discusses the importance of meaningful link text. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Emil Stenström discusses the importance of meaningful link text. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Design - standards based web design, development and training &#187; Some links for light reading (5/12/06)</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-8457</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Design - standards based web design, development and training &#187; Some links for light reading (5/12/06)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 05:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-8457</guid>
		<description>[...] Click here to read this article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Click here to read this article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: milo317</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-8125</link>
		<dc:creator>milo317</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 11:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-8125</guid>
		<description>What about enabling &quot;tool tips&quot; and adding a small description in the link title?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about enabling &#8220;tool tips&#8221; and adding a small description in the link title?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zenshadow</title>
		<link>http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-8103</link>
		<dc:creator>zenshadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://friendlybit.com/other/click-here-to-read-this-article/#comment-8103</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://tagworld.com/zenshadow/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Click here&lt;/a&gt; (sorry, couldn&#039;t resist!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://tagworld.com/zenshadow/" rel="nofollow">Click here</a> (sorry, couldn&#8217;t resist!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.002 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 383/391 objects using disk: basic

Served from: friendlybit.com @ 2012-05-22 10:02:20 -->
