Fixing Microsoft’s bad reputation
Microsoft has continuously failed at getting people in the tech crowd to like them. This is a growing problem for them, and something they need to start taking seriously. To understand how to turn this around, let's start a decade ago, with Slashdot.
Slashdot has always been one of the pillars of Microsoft-negative news. They have a whole category on Microsoft (And the others have lots of articles too: "Microsoft" articles on Digg, "Microsoft" articles on Reddit, "Microsoft" articles on Hacker News). With a few exceptions, articles (and comments) are about Microsoft using their monopoly to crush smaller businesses, how their technology is inferior to what the open source world creates, on them creating data lock-in where users are unable to switch away from them, and so on. Slashdot, Digg, Reddit, Hacker News together have millions of daily users, who place as much faith in them as others do in their morning newspaper.
But these sites are only read by disgruntled teens right? No. Hacker news users are ~26, Reddit users are ~24, Digg users are 35-44… When asked: "What computer do you want?" These users answer: "A Mac (or Linux) laptop". When asked: "What software? They answer: "Google Docs (or LibreOffice/OpenOffice)". All those individual choices are starting to pile up, and have far-reaching consequences for Microsoft: Windows and Office licenses are the major part of Microsoft's income. Choosing a Mac or Linux laptop means no Microsoft Windows, choosing Google Docs or LibreOffice/OpenOffice means no Microsoft Office.
Tech users are a major force inside real companies, and not something Microsoft can just ignore. What about beginners and business users? They are both heavily influenced by by tech users. Beginners because they ask others for advise before buying their computers and software. Business users are instead controlled by their IT departments, which in turn try to find the most knowledgeable tech people to work for them. The small hold Microsoft still have on some IT departments is slowly shifted away from them when employees get empowered to choose their own equipment, moving them from business users to beginners in their purchase patterns. The tech crowd has more influence than you'd think.
Question is: where do you start fixing all this distrust? There's only one way: you start talking to tech users on their own terms. Here's how I would do it:
- Hire some good of community managers. Their job will not be to market Microsoft, but to be the communication channel that can aggregate community opinions to Microsoft. The more rooted they already are in their respective communities the better; that makes it easier to start get the discussion started at a respectful level. You don't yell "Microsoft sucks!" at someone you respect.
- Start by monitoring news about Microsoft and send monthly reports to managers inside Microsoft. Couple each news item with an approximate number of users that read them. This will paint an image of how tech users see the Microsoft brand. Pretty soon they will want to change that image.
- Use community managers to ask for opinions on what to do next. Ask for small things that are likely easy to get done, and make sure to manage expectations right away. Windows 8 won't be open sourced :)
- Have a small engineering team whose sole purpose is to make the suggestions from the tech crowd happen. They need to be cross-disciplinary, be well connected across the company, and have mandate from high up the organization. Employing this team is a small cost compared to other forms of marketing. Feed back any progress they make back as articles where they fit.
- Lastly: Use insights from community managers to create marketing campaigns directly aimed at the tech crowd. A good community manager can have a pretty good guess at what work and what will. Many of the things will not only be marketing, but also require engineering, but there already is a team for that.
Working through that list will make Microsoft slowly earn their trust back from the tech crowd. It won't happen overnight; you don’t reverse 10 years of silence that fast. But I think this is doable, reasonable, and something that really could work.
Would you be willing to be a community manager for Microsoft? What would you suggestion Microsoft did to please the tech crowd? I'd love to hear your opinions.
Comments
By: Mikael Lundin (#1)
Microsoft today is not an evil company. But some will bear grudge against it until the day they die.
By: Emil Stenström (#2)
By: jurie (#3)
By: Mikael Lundin (#4)
Those opinions won't reach the every day Windows/Office user. That is where Microsoft need their influence, and I think they've got back a lot of credibility with Office 2010 and Windows 7.
By: Emil Stenström (#5)
By: Markus Ullmark (#6)
I was especially happy about how they handled the "jailbreaking" of windows phone 7. Let's see if it lasts.
By: boatrod (#7)
I wouldn't say I'm a tech user but as a proponent of Mac I was asked by a beginner (after troubleshooting his Windows display driver update for an hour) what computer I would recommend. He was all ears. Point is that tech users are Mac users and so I would agree they need to start appealing
to them on a new level.
By: Jeff (#8)
I wouldn't say they've turned that around, exactly, but what they have done in the past few years to improve IE means a whole lot more to me than anything they can say. I stopped listening to their hype a long time ago. Show me, don't tell me.
By: robert (#9)
Robert
By: Nick (#10)
By: Carlos (#11)
I know a lot of the "Tech Users" mentioned in this article, usually are linux fans, i know few "Tech Users" that would chose a Mac for anything other than browsing the web and going to class with it, except for the Mac fans in my workplace, that have a huge Mac just to have it run a windows virtual machine on a much smaller screen next to it :P.
Im an active user (and fan) of the windows 7 OS, love theyr office suite (far superior to any other productivity software available), and generally consider theyr Software good, sure they make some mistakes (Windows ME, Windows Vista), but they seem to learn from them and allways come back with something great (Windows 7), plus, they seem to have learned to use the power of the comunity, just look at the kinect case.
By: Mike (#12)
The product to me is the most important thing and bad experience over the years has led me to put my faith in Apple products over Microsoft.
By: Emil Stenström (#13)
By: Luke (#14)
By: Jamie Murphy (#15)
By: Anders Ytterström (#16)
However, I agree completely. If more Tech people with huge impact by tweeting and writing blog posts were writing about all GOOD and GREAT stuff Microsoft put out, there would be a change in the air coming.
I personally could imagine myself talking about stuff I like about the .NET platform, since I use and work well with C# and .NET MVC. I feel good about Nokia+Win Phone 7 since it could become a good alternative for Tech people who want a really good phone and could not find it in any Android device or an iPhone.
Since I will be developing native apps for WP7 I could see myself talk and write about the importance of making Titanium extend their services to WP7 too.
I could do that, if Microsoft managed to inspire me.
By: Belinda Stroming (#17)
By: Steve Lee (#18)
Now lets talk Apple, I don't have a Mac but my family members do, Apple does have a closed system in some regards because this is the ideal if you want things to work the very best they can. MS and Apple have different approaches and I personally think people are fed up of Windows, patching, virus, buggy etc. Apple own it end to end and this does work better. If I didn't need Windows for work I'd switch today!
By: Ray (#19)
Don't tell me - Show me.
Praises are sung to the background music of quality. That is in both product and service.
By: Brian (#20)
Regarding the proposed suggestions for microsoft, while they seem well thought-out and realistic, there is an element of letting the inmates run the asylum.
Apple's way of telling the market what it wants rather than listening seems to trump the suggested approach, no?
By: Gary Ruplinger (#21)